Is this really why we sequenced the human genome?
I usually like Nicolas Wade, but this very first sentence of a piece in this week's NY Times science section is not right:
The principal rationale for the $3 billion spent to decode the human genome was that it would enable the discovery of the variant genes that predispose people to common diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s.
This is not the principal rationale for the human genome sequence. Hyping it this way again sets life scientists up for failure, just as in the War on Cancer. People are starting to ask, so where are those cures based on knowing Alzheimer's gene variants?
The human…