Proving myself wrong in record time (see comments on my first post, where I claimed I wouldn't be discussing squid recipes), today's squid is served with chiles, lime, and herbs.

Why?

The coincidence was just too good to pass up. Another commenter suggested that squid popularity these days isn't just a flash in the pan--and then a recipe blog in the Village Voice by that very name posts a squid dish!

Of course, I see it as an opportunity to discuss seafood labeling and sustainability. I've noticed the recipe ingredient list never gets any more specific than "squid". But there are lots of squid in the world. Which species should you buy if you're making this or any other recipe? How would you even know what's available? It's not like scientific names are ever printed on the packaging.

The Monterey Bay Aquarium's Seafood Watch program lists four different kinds of squid--wait, scratch that, one of the "kinds" is plain "squid". I guess they did that because sometimes you just can't find out what species you're buying. Here's what they have to say about it:

Increasingly, squid are becoming the target in areas where other species have declined due to overfishing. Without effective management and enforcement measures in place we are concerned that squid fisheries are at risk of collapse.

I couldn't have put it better. The problem is that we know so very little about squid that it's hard to even design effective management, much less enforce it. For many squid species, we have no biomass estimates, little knowledge of spawning seasonality or location, and a limited understanding of population dynamics. This is exactly the situation we had at the beginning of exploiting the many, many fish stocks that have since collapsed!

Now we know more about the biology of these fish, but we're faced with using that knowledge to recover a disaster, instead of preventing a disaster in the first place.

Off the soapbox and on to practical matters: at least one commercially fished squid, Loligo pealei, the long-finned squid, has a reasonably thorough stock assessment and scientists believe the fishery is in good shape. So, if you're ready to make that flash in the pan, look for longfins!

Old NID
59095
Categories

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…