Skip to main content

Test announcement

Announcement here about some event or update. Or maybe link to promoted article. 

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors
X X - place for social icons.

User menu

  • Log in

Paul Callaghan, top New Zealand scientist, dies at 64

By Hank Campbell in Science 2.0
March 24, 2012
Profile picture for user Hank
Submitted by Hank on Sat, 03/24/2012 - 03:44
Old NID
88324

Paul Callaghan, a top New Zealand scientist who gained international recognition for his work in molecular physics, has died after a long battle with bowel cancer. He was 64.

In a time of increasing desire for nationalized funding of science, Callaghan, best known for his work with magnetic resonance, argued in favor of commercializing science. He was able to make science accessible to regular New Zealanders by explaining it in a straightforward and entertaining way, and that he was able to use radio, books and public lectures to promote his view that the country could use science to become a wealthier and better place.

"New Zealand has suffered a tremendous loss," Sir Peter Gluckman, Prime Minister John Key's chief science adviser, said in a statement Saturday. "Paul has been our most distinguished public scientist and in the world of molecular physics has been a giant."

R.I.P.

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Test for editor3
Test for editor3
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Porta nibh venenatis cras sed. Pharetra massa massa ultricies mi quis…
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…

More reads

Featured Image

Smoking Can Hamper Common Treatment For Breast Cancer

We know that individuals who smoke take major health risks. Now a new research study from Lund University in Sweden shows that common treatment for breast cancer works less well in patients who smoke…
Featured Image

Laterality: Finding Out About The Human Mind Through Stone

Laterality is the preference of human beings for one side of our bodies; being left-handed or right-handed, for example, or having a preference for using one eye or ear or the other.
Featured Image

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein Right On Black Woman. Wrong On TMT!

Physics, and STEM are fundamentally neutral but the human beings who do them are not, including the ones that write about how biased everyone else is.  Who gets funding, who gets a job, and
Featured Image

Women Earn 2 Percent Less Than Men - And The Reason Why May Be The Myth Of Lack Of Female Confidence

Everyone says they have impostor syndrome about something, so perhaps many people just mask it and appear confident. Do men mask it better than women? 

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms