Over the past few weeks there have a been a series of reports raising
concerns about the felling of old-growth trees in the
ancient Bialowiezça forest in eastern Poland. A recent piece in the Guardian begins
Europe’s
last primeval forest is facing what campaigners call its last stand as
loggers prepare to start clear-cutting trees, following the dismissal of
dozens of scientists and conservation experts opposed to the plan.
and
goes onto blame Poland's "far right" government for cashing in from
logging operations, and ruthlessly purging the state council for nature
conservancy of environmentalists, replacing them with officials
connected to the forestry industry. Greenpeace are considering direct
action, and the WWF and others have lodged a complaint with the European commission over the proposed "illegal" logging, and various petitions have been run to oppose the governments' intervention.
Photos: Bialowiezça forest, Graham Strouts 2013
Bialowiezça
forest covers approximately 143,000ha split between Poland and Belarus,
the larger part of some 80,000 ha in Belarus. About 10,000ha -1/6th-
of the Polish side falls under the stricter regulation of National Park
status, originally designated in 1932.
Ostensibly, the logging is
an attempt to slow the spread of the latest bark beetle outbreak,
affecting more than a million trees in Bialowiezça. In some respects the
conflict can be seen as being between differing management approaches,
but on deeper examination cuts to the heart of similar conflicts
surrounding environmentalism where Nature is placed above the needs of
people.
While the foresters prefer an active approach of
sanitation felling, removing whole sections of affected trees to prevent
further spread of infection, conservation organisations- and many
ecologists- prefer an adaptive strategy of letting nature take its
course, more in keeping with the designation of the Puszcza as
one of Europe's last primeval, untouched wildernesses. The foresters are
accused of being concerned only for profit, while the environmentalists
are slated for having no concern for the needs of the local community-
which has traditionally foraged firewood, fungi and more from the
forest- and placing a reified version of "pristine Nature" above the
needs of ordinary people.
There is certainly good reason to
consider adaptive approaches. Bark beetle outbreaks can be so
devastating over such a wide area that anything other than hoping for
natural adaptation may be unfeasible. Genetic resistance will show up
in the few surviving trees, and the forest will take on a more clumpy
patchwork and diverse structure, leaving it less open to future attacks
(Six, 2014). In the medium term however, the transformation of the
landscape with over 90% of mature trees dead is likely to be
devastating.
Despite Bialowiezça
being widely valued as "primeval" forest, nearly all of it has been
managed to some extent for centuries, and since the mid-19th century,
with the exception of the inner core of the National Park, much of it
has in fact been logged on a number of occasions: by the Germans in
World War 1, the Polish administration in the years after the war; by
the British Century corporation in the late 1920s, the State forestry
service and then the Soviets in the early years of WW 2 (Szujecki).
Ironically perhaps, it was the Germans in WW2 who made the first serious
move for stricter conservation controls, putting an end to the logging
and driving thousands of Bellarussian farmers out of their forest
villagers in order to keep the forest for their own hunting- in keeping
with the more esoteric and ecological strand of thinking that ran
through Nazism and which valued the purity of Nature over the needs of
people (Biehl and Staudenmaier 1995)- and which has left a legacy of
misanthropy running through the darker side of the conservation movement
today.
Most of the forest- 84% - is outside of the national park
and not subject to its strict hands-off regulations- and it is here that
the proposed felling will take place. Although the new felling does
represent a tripling of the existing quota, this is still less than
historic amounts, and will not be in previously unmanaged protected
inner core, representing perhaps just 1-2% of the total forest area.
Polish foresters argue
that the current beetle attack is not only far larger than previous
ones- perhaps exacerbated by climate change leading to greater water
stress on the trees- but that it is also attacking younger trees which
would usually be expected to be more resilient, and is spreading to
other species including pines and larch. Moreover, the current outbreak
is a result of stricter conservation policies that were introduced to
much of the greater forest area in 2012, prohibiting the more frequent,
smaller judicious sanitation felling that was part of a general beetle
control program up until then. As a result, the infestation has spread
to a much greater area, threatening the whole forest.
This has
parallels with fire management in Yellowstone National Park. In the
early days of the park, fires were suppressed, leading to a build-up of
litter on the forest floor. Eventually a much greater conflagration
would occur with devastating results (Bengtsson et al 2003). Since then,
practice has changed to allow non-man-made fires to run their course.
In this way, small, periodic disturbances can lead to greater forest
resilience.
The Myth of the Primeval Forest
Such disputes over management practices in the Puszcza are
by no means new, but in fact seem to recur as periodically as the
beetle outbreaks. Franklin (2002) argues that Bialowiezça has suffered
for the cause of "crisis environmentalism" whereby policies are promoted
under the guise of emergency legislation. The ancient, so-called
"primeval" and supposedly pristine forest- an untouchable jewel of
natural perfection - is portrayed as being under threat of imminent
destruction by greedy foresters, when in fact the forest has always been
used by the local communities for meeting their immediate needs and
gaining livelihoods (Marris 2013). This practice can be traced to a
sensationalised newspaper article of 1992 (Franklin 2002) claiming the
forest was dying, leading to demonstrations by Greenpeace and US Deep
Ecology groups demanding higher protection status for the forest.
Today's social media outcry, with petitions and threats of direct
action, reads very much like a re-run of these earlier events.
As
with other ex-Soviet nations (Schwartz 2005), these conservation
conflicts in Eastern Poland have also been tied up with a search for
national identity and a shifting of attention away from other areas of
environmental concern- such as industrial pollution- to appease the
sensibilities of Western conservation interests and ideologies. It has
been in the Polish States interest to play up the "pristine" image of
Bialowiezça, at least when the national park was first established, so
much so that carefully crafted propaganda films were made editing out
any sign of human influence.
Eventually, moves towards significant
enlargement of the protected area met up with local opposition
concerned at the removal of their forest rights by outside environmental
organisations. A protest in March 2000 by a consortium of foresters,
local councilors and Bellorussian groups put and end, for the time
being, to the myth of the pristine forest with no people.
Where
does the truth now lie? Possibly as is often the case somewhere in the
middle: in the past, over-zealous conservation movements, muscling in
from outside with lack of consultation with local communities and
without fully understanding the politics of the region, created a
backlash which may now be being exploited by some interests eager to
exploit disaffection with outside interference in order to make a quick
buck. It is hard to know more without being much closer to the ground
there. The Bialowiezça forest does have unique biodiversity value, but
leaving it entirely to nature with no management at all will not
guarantee the best outcome for biodiversity; at the same time, local
concerns about loss of employment and access to forest resources need to
be considered if successful conservation is to be achieved (Blicharska
and Angelstam, 2010).
The dispute over management practices will
no doubt continue, perhaps for as long as the forest stays standing- and
there is no reason it will disappear for many centuries yet, whatever
happens. While it could be argued that leaving the trees to the fate of
the bark beetle is the best course of action, that would be likely to
change the nature of the forest for a very long time. In place of the
giant hundred-year-old spruce trees there would likely emerge instead
extensive patches of willow and alder. The dark, mysterious atmosphere
and sense of timelessness that a visit to the forest currently evokes
may be lost, and while the forest will still be there, its image as one
of the last refuges of pristine wilderness be tarnished for good.
First published 1st June 2016 on theculturalwilderness
For Martin
References
Biehl, J. and Staudenmaier, P. 1995 Eco-fascism: Lessons from the German Experience
AK Press
Bengtsson et al 2003 Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes Ambio Vol. 32 No. 6, Sept. 2003
Blicharska, M. and Angelstam, P. 2010 Conservation at risk: conflict analysis in the
Białowieża Forest, a European biodiversity hotspot International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services&Management, 6: 1, 68 — 74
Franklin, S. 2002 Biaowiezça Forest, Poland: representation, myth, and the politics of dispossession Environment and Planning A 2002, volume 34, pages 1459 ^ 1485
Marris, E. 2013 The Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World
Bloomsbury USA
Schwartz, K.Z.S. 2005 "Masters in Our Native Place": The politics of Latvian national parks on the road from Communism to "Europe" Political Geography 25 (2006) 42e71
Six, D.L., Biber, E., Long, E. 2014 Management for Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Suppression: Does Relevant Science Support Current Policy? Forests 2014, 5, 103-133; doi:10.3390/f5010103
Szujecki, A. The Bialowieza Primeval Forest- Conflicts over its Conservation and Managment
Białystok Regional Directorate of the State Forests NFH
