Neil deGrasse Tyson: Proved Scientist Are Not Infallible. A Learned Opinion.
Neil deGrasse Tyson PhD invoked the
fact he had a PhD and Tchiya Amet El Maat did not have a PhD to imply that
he is necessarily more credible than her. Furthermore, he used her beliefs
against her. His explanation was pure argumentum ad verecundiam, appeal to
authority a logical fallacy and that it protected him for so long is part of this story. A conclusion reached from a flawed
premise, that he is an authoritative scientist and therefore he must be
correct, is itself flawed. He is not the only one scientist, or nonscientist…