When I walk in a seminar or lecture room, it looks mostly as 30 or 40 years ago. Then lifting my eyes I would notice that the "data"-projector is still there hanging from the ceiling, in addition to the overhead projector covered by chalk dust in the corner. The rooms are still dominated by various green- black- or sometimes white- boards, in most cases serving as source of kilograms of chalk dust per decade - or more - I did not measure, but that seems reaosonable, some 200 g per year. But that is not the main point now.

When I walk in a seminar or lecture room, it looks mostly as 30 or 40 years ago. Then lifting my eyes I would notice that the "data"-projector is still there hanging from the ceiling, in addition to the overhead projector covered by chalk dust in the corner. The rooms are still dominated by various green- black- or sometimes white- boards, in most cases serving as source of kilograms of chalk dust per decade - or more - I did not measure, but that seems reaosonable, some 200 g per year. But that is not the main point now. My point is what happened with all the "smart" boards, interactive whiteboards (some of the combinations are trade marks, so I must write carefully), why are they not in all the rooms and what really happened while I was busy waiting for the technological revolution in teaching.

When I walk in a seminar or lecture room, it looks mostly as 30 or 40 years ago. Then lifting my eyes I would notice that the "data"-projector is still there hanging from the ceiling, in addition to the overhead projector covered by chalk dust in the corner. The rooms are still dominated by various green- black- or sometimes white- boards, in most cases serving as source of kilograms of chalk dust per decade - or more - I did not measure, but that seems reaosonable, some 200 g per year. But that is not the main point now. My point is what happened with all the "smart" boards, interactive whiteboards (some of the combinations are trade marks, so I must write carefully), why are they not in all the rooms and what really happened while I was busy waiting for the technological revolution in teaching.

Old NID
118253

Ladislav Kocbach

Born in Prague (CZ), studied physics. Started with algol programming on GIER-1 in Rez of the shell model of nuclei in 1966. Moved to Bergen, Norway. Dr. philos. in 1977, atomic collisions, ionization, theoretical physics (with computation). Scientific visualization with computer graphics. Recently working with model interactions for molecular dynamics. Teaching various things. Theoretical, Optcal and Atomic Physics at University of Bergen, Norway. Occupied by computing, computers. Tries to live without printing and photocopying. During the last 18 months printed not more than 100 pages, all… Read more