Following the appearance of Kent Staley's review of my book "Anomaly!" in the November 2017 issue of Physics Today, the online site of the magazine offers, starting today, an interview with yours truly. I think the piece is quite readable and I encourage you to give it a look. Here I only quote a couple of passages for the laziest readers.

PT: What was the most surprising or challenging thing about working in a large collaboration like CDF?

DORIGO: Back in those years, CDF looked like a large collaboration, yet now CMS and ATLAS have an order of magnitude more collaborators. This makes a tremendous difference, as there is no chance that decisions can be made by sitting in the same room and arguing until exhaustion. In CDF that was still possible, and it was challenging, surprising, and exciting. You could feel that your opinion counted—if it had scientific merit—and was considered with care by your colleagues, regardless of your academic title. It was an amazingly open environment where an undergraduate could take a seat around a table and sit elbow to elbow with the biggest shots in the field and still feel at ease. I learned things at the speed of light there. I am especially grateful to some of the old masters in CDF for the knowledge I absorbed there, most of all Giorgio Bellettini, who at more than 80 years of age is still the spokesperson for that glorious experiment.

Later I also make the following point:

[...] large collaborations support the invaluable merits of peer review in the production of scientific results. Yet the peer review that large physics collaborations get when they submit a result for publication is irrelevant—a pair of external reviewers will never be able to scrutinize those analyses as deeply as needed. Instead, collaborations employ an internal review process to verify the quality of the work. That process is correctly unforgiving but unfortunately also sometimes brutal. In exceptional cases, it gets to the point of hampering the open sharing of information among scientists.
The fact that this internal scrutiny is never explained to the public, and its proceedings are not made accessible in any way after an article is published, should be a concern for the field. 

I am grateful to Physics Today for this chance of speaking about the glorious CDF experiment, the top discovery, and my views on a couple of related subjects...

----

Tommaso Dorigo is an experimental particle physicist, who works for the INFN at the University of Padova, and collaborates with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. He coordinates the European network AMVA4NewPhysics as well as research in accelerator-based physics for INFN-Padova, and is an editor of the journal Reviews in Physics. In 2016 Dorigo published the book “Anomaly! Collider physics and the quest for new phenomena at Fermilab”. You can get a copy of the book on Amazon.

Old NID
228512
Categories

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…