A new study published in PLoS Medicine has found that skepticism about the benefit of the HPV vaccine remains high among parents of adolescent girls.

Even when financial and healthcare barriers are removed, some parents remain hesitant to have their daughters receive the vaccine - the more educated parents are, the less likely it is they will consent, says the new study.  As a result, policymakers must spend more money to ensure that the debate is properly framed.

The authors surveyed parents of sixth-grade girls (age 11) in a publicly funded school-based program in British Columbia, Canada, to determine the level of uptake of the first dose of the HPV vaccine, and to examine the factors involved in their decision to allow receipt of the vaccine.

65% of the 2,025 parents who completed the survey had consented to their daughter receiving the first dose of HPV vaccine, though more than 85% of the parents reported to have consented to hepatitis B and meningitis C vaccinations for their daughters.

The naysayers were not the usual suspects;   Families with two parents or three or more children and having well-educated parents decreased the likelihood of a daughter receiving the vaccine.

Why did they say no?  Almost a third of the parents said concern about the vaccine's safety was their main reason, a lesser percentage felt the children were too young to need a vaccine against genital warts or a rare cervical cancer and one in eight said they had not been given sufficient information to make an informed decision.

A positive parental attitude towards vaccination and a parental belief that the HPV vaccination would not increase sexual practices in their children increased the likelihood of a daughter receiving the HPV vaccine.

Citation: Ogilvie et al., 'A Population-Based Evaluation of a Publicly Funded, School-Based HPV Vaccine Program in British Columbia, Canada: Parental Factors Associated with HPV Vaccine Receipt', PLoS Med 7(5): e1000270; doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000270

Old NID
67580
Categories

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…