Skip to main content

Test announcement

Announcement here about some event or update. Or maybe link to promoted article. 

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors
X X - place for social icons.

User menu

  • Log in

More Like Wishcycling: Aspirational Recyclers Don't Want To Read This

By Hank Campbell in Science 2.0
November 22, 2019
Profile picture for user Hank
Submitted by Hank on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 02:31
Old NID
243526

Much of recycling is aspirational, and we choose to believe it works because we don't want to feel worse knowing it is a scam.

In the 1980s I worked as a fundraiser for an environmental group, Public Interest Research Group.  PIRG had all of the predictable anti-science activism points, which was a challenge since part of the region I covered contained a whole lot of people working at Westinghouse Nuclear, but I would concede they were goofy when it came to nuclear energy, yet argue they were absolutely right that a bottle bill - a refundable fee on top of the cost of a bottle - was better for everyone than government recycling.

Real data, not bogus survey nonsense, showed some would return bottles to get their nickel back but almost all who did not do that stored glass bottles and Boy Scouts or whoever would come pick them up, just like they do Christmas trees. They got the money and the glass would get recycled. Virtually no one would throw them in the garbage.

Instead of bottle bills that made sense, most of us got government recycling, which has meant this:

My concerns about government recycling turned out to be true. Though government is in almost every urban community now, it is a scam. A few years ago I wrote an article noting that one of California's top exports to China was recycling. We put stuff in a special bin, government employees collect it using giant emissions-belching trucks, and our taxes pay companies to ship it to China on giant, emissions-belching ships where ... well, nothing. They didn't recycle it, almost 90 percent of items California claims should go into a blue bin can't be recycled, it went into giant landfills. We could have done that here without adding all that CO2 into the atmosphere. When China decided to retaliate against the Trump administration for tariffs, they shut off California recycling too. Ironic, since California is the state most opposed to Republicans. A progressive govenment that had vowed in 2011 that 75 percent recycling would occur by 2020 suddenly slid backwards, because actual recycling plants did not want the actual useless junk that California pretended was being repurposed into useful products. 

Now two generations have grown up thinking recycling is valuable, and even bought into grander mythologies about what can actually be recycled. This “wish-cycling” is putting things into the recycling bin that people think should be recycled, like that greasy pizza box.

But no, that does more harm than good, same for that engine block you think can be recycled just because it's made of metal.

Jillian Mock
at Discover has the details.

P.S. Composting is terrible for the environment too.

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Test for editor3
Test for editor3
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Porta nibh venenatis cras sed. Pharetra massa massa ultricies mi quis…
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…

More reads

Featured Image

Young Women Seem Healthier Than Men, And If They Claim Heart Attack Symptoms That Delays Treatment

Men may be more reluctant to go to a doctor for chest pain but when they get to a care facility, a new analysis finds they get it quicker than women. In this look at the data, all of the patients…
Featured Image

Beekeepers Are Wrong About Overwinter Hive Behavior

Honeybees in man-made hives may have been suffering the cold unnecessarily for over a century because commercial hive designs are based on erroneous science, my new research shows.
Featured Image

Oumuamua Was Not Aliens, Avi Loeb Is Not Wrong, The Reporting Is.

Oumuamua was hypothesized by Avi Loeb to be an alien probe due to its apparent very flat shape and hyperbolic path through the solar system.  It was almost certainly not an alien probe.
Featured Image

Far More Taxpayer Funded Science Has Become Free To Read Thanks To Coronavirus - That May Be Here To Stay

Scientific publishing is not known for moving rapidly. In normal times, publishing new research can take months, if not years. Researchers prepare a first version of a paper on new findings and…

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms