Are Science Site Readers into Science or only Sex

Write a critical article about how science careers, including your own, are destroyed and science is corrupted today; put it on a “science” site; get 2400 readers in three months and basically no reaction except for a so called “Institute of ETHICS and Emergent Technologies” still not wanting anything to do with you anymore since your last criticism of pseudo-science, when they and the rest of the “science” blogging community removed you from their sight.

 

Suggest doable science outreach that could cut traffic accidents; dare criticize darlings of the pretend secular “science” scene for their hidden creationism; get almost no readers over months and no reaction except for “science” writers removing you from their friend list on a “science” site and the “science” site overlord telling you once again that you have contributed nothing to science ever and only write utter nonsense pulling others’ “accomplishments” down.

 

Suggest a truly innovative form of essay contest that ensures transparency, independence, and collaboration exactly like many out there claim they want it; invite their suggestions to even themselves improve the suggested rules in order to ensure a truly collaborative result.  Get nothing.

 

Write a sexist rant, scientific content worth about five lines, that you thought up in a few minutes on your way to the office after something pissed you off; put it on the “science” site during xmas when traffic is slow; get more readers and comments in two f'n days (!) than the critical articles in months; have the site guru tell you how awesome it is and the “Institute of ETHICS and Emergent Technologies” suddenly request articles again.

 

Get the message; get a life; drop out of science; make scat porn flicks letting Thai girls slurp your fluids through their worn nylons while fingering their crevices with electrified rubber gloves; get recognition for your innovative contributions and stop being worried about your retirement options.

Thank you guys – Science blogging taught me valuable lessons about science and science writing.

 

Hey babes – I got some high level elevated science for you!

Old NID
99869

Latest reads

Article teaser image
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…