For discussion we’ll take an EPR pair as two spin 1/2 particles anti-correlated in a singlet state at the source.
· How does an EPR pair maintain conservation of total angular momentum over space-like separations? That is, if Alice’s spin is flipped, how does Bob’s spin flop?
or
· Using physical logic, explain non-locality as suggestedby Bell’s Theorem.
or
· What are “quantum channels”?
Since to date, no one has been able to explain the above within quantum theory, the conclusion must be that quantum mechanics is incomplete.
The phase “quantum weirdness” is recognized as meaningless and has no place in science.
Another part of the challenge is to complete quantum theory with no weirdness and which agrees with all the experimental data.
In many ways this site is the antithesis of the blog:
Quantum Crackpot RandiChallenge: Help Perimeter Physicist Joy Christian To Collect The Nobel Prize
Their challenge is
“Anybodywith some crackpot “local QM” theory is cordially invited to either write theprogram (as described in the emails) so that Bell’s inequality is violated or to shut the hell up (precisely like thetraditional Randi Challenge)! And we want to see no other angles but those three where quantumphysics maximally violates Bell’s inequality. We have no interest whatsoever in allthe other amazing stuff that you claim you can do with it. Either simulate thequantum behavior in that simple experiment at the three angles including Pi/8or don’t waste our time! If you are successful, fame is yours.”
