Having considered Humboldt squid consumption from the public (human) health perspective, let's try judging it for environmental health.

If Humboldts are truly an invasive species, then it should be good for the environment to eat them. They seem to like eating a lot of the same fish that humans do, so their invasion provides unwelcome competition. Some folks are thinking it might not be a bad idea to open a commerical fishery for Humboldts, just to reduce their ecological (and economical) impact!

Maybe so--from California northwards. But in Mexico, Central and South America, Humboldts are not invasive. They are a native species, a natural part of the ecosystem. And they are supporting the largest invertebrate fishery in the world, which lands close to a million tons of squid a year.

The same features that make squid weedy--short lifespan, quick reproduction, ecological generalists--also make for good sustainability potential in their fisheries. But that's just potential. No taxon, as far as I can tell, is immune to overfishing, and the less we know about their biology, the riskier the fishing business.

Unfortunately, our biological knowledge of Humboldts is quite limited. One example: we still don't know where to find the enormous numbers of baby squid that must be growing up into eight hundred thousand tons of squid a year.

At the moment, no one is actually worried about overfishing Humboldt squid--it looks like an inexhaustible resource if ever there was one. But there was a time when no one worried about overfishing whales, either.

Old NID
60602

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…