Skip to main content

Test announcement

Announcement here about some event or update. Or maybe link to promoted article. 

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors
X XD

User menu

  • Log in

EPA Should Scuttle Anti-Science PFAS Claims

By Hank Campbell in Science 2.0
January 23, 2025
Profile picture for user Hank
Submitted by Hank on Thu, 01/23/2025 - 08:29
Old NID
257294

PFAS, called "forever chemicals” by activists, are about 12,000 compounds, 11,993 of them found in nature, yet environmentalists in their Forever War On Science have been targeting them based on epidemiological correlation. You know, that same "science" that claimed chocolate is health food, butter is bad and trans fats are good, and that a parasite medication cured COVID-19.

Why should you not trust their claims? Because they said PFAS is in 48% of water. Maybe you think that is really high, but the reason not to trust their manufactured correlation is because it's actually far too low. It should be 90% but environmental lawyers chose the lowest figure they could, likely because they realized if people knew PFAS were everywhere, even in rural spring water, and 300% greater at night because of nature, juries would not be alarmed and hand them giant settlements.

The Biden administration was doing its part to help its political allies. He was in the running to surpass President Clinton as the most anti-science in history and he would have vaulted into first place if he'd served more than one term. Luckily for consumers who've already been penalized with 44% higher food prices due to government tinkering, the new regulation on PFAS in water was not enacted.


The Guardian in England remains the go-to newspaper for the anti-science left.

New EPA leadership should remove epidemiologists from being some kind of bizarre Supreme Court Over Science and call a halt to all new regulations and rethink recent ones, because none of them were based in science. They were instead all correlation but, thanks to rampant abuse of Chevron Deference - so alarming the Supreme Court finally undid it after 40 years of undermining evidence-based policies - all became laws without Congress or voters involved. All agencies had to do was engage in Mandate Creep and ask the President to change their mandate so it includes more and more power and they never need Congress. They have regulations.(1)

Using epidemiology, the Biden EPA went to court and asked the court to void old EPA scientific findings so they could create a new "level" for a weedkiller in water so low that any use would be illegal. The court was confused (at least officially, every judge knows that this stuff is) why EPA could overrule its own biologists, chemists, and toxicologists in favor of epidemiologists who just looked at other claims they hand-picked for their meta-analysis, but complied.

That sort of thing should stop. The Trump administration should not only undo the abuses of the last few years, they should get Congress to make sure it can never happen again. That would be a true public service for the country and provide a lot more real benefit than pretending current regulations of PFAS in water are causing people to keel over left and right.

Hysterical claims by environmentalists always need to be challenged with the same skepticism we show toward any political claim; where are the bodies?

NOTE:

(1) It is why US Fish and Wildlife under the Obama administration was able to punish a landowner in Louisiana - they told them, using a "study" with no published data that anyone can interpret - that the Mississippi Gopher Frog, which does not live in Louisiana, needed a habitat there. The Obama administration order the owner to tear down a forest and put up a new one. If they refused, they'd never get building permits to make housing for people who wanted to leave New Orleans before the next hurricane hit.

The Supreme Court voted unanimously against the federal government on that one and we were proud to have helped.

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age Culture, Margaret Thatcher Was The Norm
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…

More reads

Featured Image

Adapting As Nano Approaches Biological Complexity: Witnessing Human-AI Integration Critically

Today’s emergence of nano-micro hybrid structures with almost biological complexity is of fundamental interest.
Featured Image

How To Read A Closed Book Won't Be A Zen Riddle For Much Longer

You soon won't have to judge a book by its cover, you'll be able to judge through it. Researchers writing in Nature Communications describe a prototype of an imaging system that can read closed books…
Featured Image

Solar Power Is A Manifestation Of Income Inequality, Solar Geoengineering May Instead Fix It

Solar panel proponents rave about their solar energy. They tout how low their electricity bills are, that the utility is forced to buy energy from them at the same price they sell it, and that they…
Featured Image

Do We Really Want a Technological Explosion?

Often the term technology explosion is used to indicate the rapid growth of technology in areas such as information technology or biotechnology. Usually, the assumption is that innovation creates…

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms