Skip to main content

Test announcement

Announcement here about some event or update. Or maybe link to promoted article. 

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors
X XD

User menu

  • Log in

By Targeting Mobile Homes, The Biden Administration Is Targeting The Poor

By Hank Campbell in Science 2.0
April 5, 2023
Profile picture for user Hank
Submitted by Hank on Wed, 04/05/2023 - 04:07
Old NID
256566

Mobile homes are only 6 percent of US housing, but they are a 6 percent overwhelmingly dominated by the poor and seniors on fixed incomes. When the Biden administration forced new regulations on the sector in 2022, the argument was that it would curb emissions and save poor people money.

It's the kind of ivory tower thinking that is behind solar panels; sure, if you have $25,000 to spend, you can save $75 a month and even get poor people to pay higher utility costs to subsidize you so you can brag about saving the planet, but most poor people don't have the upfront costs. It's no different than a new regulation that will force new windows and insulation, while making the housing crisis in states like California even worse. If you are wealthy or even middle class, an extra $5,000 isn't a lot but these homes are often financed, and if you don't think $17 a month matters to poor people, you don't know any. The Biden administration claims these same people will save that amount in electricity bills annually but the former is real money, while the latter is as goofy and speculative as claiming onerous new virtual pollution regulations will lead to more years lived.

The Biden administration has conceded that none of their optimistic numbers including costs for testing and enforcement, they speculated about the output while ignoring the input, and that lack of real planning is why Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) has asked to push back the implementation of the new costs, which once again puts Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm in the awkward position of going along with White House mandates publicly while quietly asking the same energy companies he's attacking to increase production and bring energy costs down before the 2024 election.

If he refuses to budge, it will lead to more urban journalists mystified why poor people who should benefit the most from big government keep voting Republican - but it isn't a surprise to anyone who grew up poor. Poor people often don't want a handout from government, they want government to get out of the way so things can be more affordable without welfare.

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age Culture, Margaret Thatcher Was The Norm
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…

More reads

Featured Image

Used PPE Equipment Could Be Repurposed Into Biofuel

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to rampant new use of personal protective equipment (PPE) but we're also facing a problem of more garbage in landfills. It could be trivial but in a world where people…
Featured Image

Correlation Hype: Your Car Seats Are Not Giving You Cancer

A U.C. Riverside environmentalist is sounding the alarm about your commute. 
Featured Image

Global Warming Has Made Global Warming Harder To Show

Postglacial rebound, uplift in Greenland blamed on global warming, has actually made it harder to measure ice loss due to global warming, according to a new paper in Science Advances.
Featured Image

Nerves Embedded In Body Fat Boost Its Calorie-Burning Capacity

There is no magic food that causes weight gain, in every study people who consume fewer calories than they burn lose weight while people who consume more gain it. Energy balance, like evolution and…

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms