Skip to main content

Test announcement

Announcement here about some event or update. Or maybe link to promoted article. 

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Culture
    • Humor
    • Mathematics
    • Random Thoughts
    • Science & Society
    • Sports Science
    • Technology
  • Earth Sciences
    • Atmospheric
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Geology
    • Oceanography
    • Paleontology
  • Life Sciences
    • Ecology & Zoology
    • Evolution
    • Immunology
    • Microbiology
    • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
    • Aging
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Research
    • Pharmacology
    • Public Health
    • Vision
  • Physical Sciences
    • Aerospace
    • Applied Physics
    • Chemistry
    • Optics
    • Physics
    • Space
  • Social Sciences
    • Anthropology
    • Archaeology
    • Philosophy & Ethics
    • Psychology
    • Science History
  • Contributors
X XD

User menu

  • Log in

APHA: Leading The Path Toward Equity - For Rich, White People

By Hank Campbell in Science 2.0
October 10, 2022
Profile picture for user Hank
Submitted by Hank on Mon, 10/10/2022 - 09:08
Old NID
256267

The American Public Health Association (APHA) is a 150-year-old organization open to "any persons interested in public health", if they are willing to fork over $225.

One thing is certain; the organic industry and its client base has money to burn, so it is little surprise that the APHA is hosting a panel by Big Organic's favorite economist, Chuck Benbrook, PhD. Benbrook is executive director of the shadowy(1) action group calling itself the Heartland Health Research Alliance after having been rousted from Washington State University, where he claimed to be a professor. 

Shilling for Big Organic is good business for him. According to his statement as an "expert" witness in a trial hoping to convince a jury that a weedkiller magically works on human biology, he paid himself $326,324 in two years and his daughter $200,000, and said his non-profit earned $3.7 million, including from attorneys suing over products he criticizes.
 
And yet charity rating agencies know nothing about his company. 

Literally, it may as well not exist, And yet he claims $4 million from "foundations" he refuses to disclose. 

If Center for Media and Democracy and its Sourcewatch group were not simply fronts for the Democratic party, they'd launch a Dark Money investigation into his organization, but instead they support him - perhaps because they share the same corporate and litigation funders? Certainly because the political party they endorse are overwhelmingly represented in the anti-science-corporate-conspiracy movement.

Perhaps that applies to APHA also, because there is no scientific reason for this panel. And no scientists on it. Instead they have conspiracy theorist Dr. Phil Landrigan and Daniele Mandrioli of the Ramazzini Institute, "an advocacy forum for their pro-compensation and aggressive regulation views on social and political issues" according to legal watchdogs. Landrigan was their president until last year.

An economist, anti-farming epidemiologists funded by the American version of Ramazzini, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and a pediatrician telling an audience they know more about chemistry, biology, and toxicology than scientists makes as much sense as me dancing about architecture for them. All I have to do is a two-step while singing "cohort" and it has a kind of truthiness veneer of science.

But one thing does make sense: Benbrook sends money to Ramazzini. At the time of publication, APHA did not respond to a request for an answer on if Benbrook also paid any fee to have his panel appear at their meeting. 

NOTE:

(1) In actuality he was an adjunct whose position was entirely organic industry funded and only after years of us shaming the university for letting him use their brand to try and create legitimacy was his position removed. But we can't even brag about that, the university only terminated his fake job after Big Organic stopped writing checks to them.

Donate

Please donate so science experts can write for the public.

At Science 2.0, scientists are the journalists, with no political bias or editorial control. We can't do it alone so please make a difference.

Donate with PayPal button 
We are a nonprofit science journalism group operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code that's educated over 300 million people.

You can help with a tax-deductible donation today and 100 percent of your gift will go toward our programs, no salaries or offices.

Latest reads

Article teaser image
No, Trump’s Executive Orders Can’t Cancel Your Rights.
Donald Trump does not have the power to rescind either constitutional amendments or federal laws by mere executive order, no matter how strongly he might wish otherwise. No president of the United…
Article teaser image
The US Discourages Pregnant Women From Drinking Alcohol - Vegetarian Diets Are Worse
The Biden administration recently issued a new report showing causal links between alcohol and cancer, and it's about time. The link has been long-known, but alcohol carcinogenic properties have been…
Article teaser image
In British Iron Age Culture, Margaret Thatcher Was The Norm
In British Iron Age society, land was inherited through the female line and husbands moved to live with the wife’s community. Strong women like Margaret Thatcher resulted.That was inferred due to DNA…

More reads

Featured Image

Solar Power Activists Keep Saying Solar Is Ready - If So, Net Metering Subsidies Are No Longer Needed

Utility customers in California are being exploited by a special class of grifters. Those who live in apartment buildings or rental homes or live in poor neighborhoods are forced by law to subsidize…
Featured Image

Hype Or Health? Sitting Is As Bad For You As Smoking

Sitting has been branded the “new smoking”
Featured Image

NIEHS 25 Year Celebration Of Endocrine Research — Some Progress, But An Even Greater Opportunity To Deliver Clarity

In 1991, Theo Colborn convened a group of international scientists to discuss concerns about the trans-generational effects of persistent chemicals on predator species in the Great Lakes.
Featured Image

Where There's Smoke -- And A Mutation -- There May Be An Evolutionary Edge For Humans

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. -- A genetic mutation may have helped modern humans adapt to smoke exposure from fires and perhaps sparked an evolutionary advantage over their archaic competitors, including…

Footer

  • About Us
  • Copyright and Removal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms